- Stephen
Thoughts, observations, and experiences shared for you to enjoy and for us to be heard. We look forward to sharing a new perspective to the many facets of life. Follow on twitter: @thesirstephen or Copy and past URL: https://twitter.com/TheSirStephen
Showing posts with label lifestyle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lifestyle. Show all posts
Monday, July 6, 2015
Virginia Outdoors
No words can truly give these experiences justice. Go outside, leave your technology (with your camera as the exception) behind, with some good friends and make some great memories. Experience nature, respect it, and the rewards are innumerable.
Thursday, June 4, 2015
A Little Morning Motivation
| After each sunset, there is a sunrise. With the sunrise comes a new start. Original photography. |
I woke up this morning determined to change my attitude.
Working on a long-term academic project with a 40 hour/week work schedule is a new challenge to me, and am experiencing a bout with the mental burnout that normally accompanies these types of endeavors. So, as I searched for a quote of the day (a ritual that I have been performing every day this summer) I found this on forbes.com:
“Life is a short day; but it is a working day. Activity may lead to evil, but inactivity cannot lead to good.”
- Hannah More (I highly recommend you look up who she is, an incredible and inspiring woman who thrived in 3 careers -- as a poet and playwright, writer on morals and religion, and a practical philanthropist)
“…but it is a working day…” In life, we are presented with a dynamic set of challenges and are blessed with unprecedented flexibility to face them. More importantly, we are recharged every night and given a fresh start every morning. Those are the tools given to us, what we do with it then falls under the domain of our beautiful free will. Men can build skyscrapers, scale mountains, heal the sick, consolidate a nation, or even sit at home all day. That is our choice. Where will you dedicate yourself? What will you do with the amazing tools bestowed to each of us, who will you impact?
“Activity may lead to evil, but inactivity cannot lead to good.” The first step, regardless of the path over which your choices will guide you, is to commit yourself to something, no, anything. Set a goal, an objective; something so perceivably unobtainable that only fools would conceive of its accomplishment. In reality, it is the fool who would tell you so. Then, have the vision. See yourself there, after the completion of that (those) goal(s). How have you changed? How did you grow, whether it be mentally, emotionally, spiritually, or physically? Think about that image you have created of how you have transformed from how you are today to how you will be tomorrow. Make the steps tangible. If you make it manageable, the summit suddenly becomes closer and closer. It’s amazing: once you begin taking the steps, there are less to be taken. Now, get there. No excuses. You have what you need; the flexibility, the access to technology, the ingenuity, and most importantly the ability to choose. If you drop the ball; no one will notice, no one will care, that is because you are responsible for your own success.
More so, the umbrella of that responsibility extends to failure. Embrace it, love it, learn from it, move on. “Activity may lead to evil,…” sometimes failure happen, unintended externalities may mitigate the gains you hoped to achieve. It happens, that is why life “is a working day…” you have to roll with it, adapt, be better the next time, be the best the time after that.
I suppose what I’m trying to say is this: YOU are the only one that is limiting yourself. If its grades, don’t dwell on what you did do, focus on what you will do. Study harder, study longer, make what you do different than what it was before and I’d guarantee that the result of those inputs will never be the same as the original.
“I’ve always figured out that there are 24 hours a day. You sleep six hours and have 18 hours left. Now, I know there are some of you out there that say ‘well, wait a minute, I sleep eight hours or nine hours.’ Well, then just sleep faster, I would recommend.” -Arnold Schwarzenegger
If its your physique. Eliminate the phrase “I’ll start tomorrow” from your vernacular. Every. Single. Day. is an opportunity, a blessing, and a curse. “..inactivity cannot lead to good.” Each day can be one day closer for you to not only accomplish the objective, but embody the vision you have set out for yourself. Each day also presents the opportunity to tear down that vision. Take the chance, take the risk, and always move forward.
Carpe Diem.
-Stephen
Saturday, February 28, 2015
The Bug
Unshakable. Insatiable.
It’s an itch and a thirst, a terminal infection. It’s
travel.
Recently, I've come into a mild travel-kick. Beginning last spring,
when I took a trip to the UK with my rugby team, I became enchanted with the
freedoms of international exploration. Always being an avid backpacker and
fisherman, I took every available moment during the next summer to explore a
new corner of the state which I call home. This winter was highlighted by a
trip to Ecuador to tune-up my Spanish abilities and tour the South American
paradise. When every day for 2 weeks was characterized by new people, a new
environment, new foods, and new culture I didn't want the excitement to stop.
It’s an addiction.
So now, sitting on a chair at my desk, I am left to dream of
future travel and postulate why it’s such an important activity in which to
engage. First, it is an opportunity to define ‘you’. Travel offers a blank
slate. No one knows who you are, you are not bound by any agenda, and your
limits are those which you set for yourself. How you handle yourself with such
autonomy will define your character: how do you use your time? Will you step
outside of your own comfort zone? Will you make the effort to meet new people?
How do you decide with whom you share your experiences? How will you decide
which experiences to have? Along with dozens of other questions, only you have
the ability to provide an answer through your actions on the trip. Second,
travel will widen your perspective on everything.
What matters to you, needs vs. wants, and daily routines all have the potential
to be challenged by any one of the experiences you will have while abroad.
Hopefully you will uncover some of the trivial problems in your life which may
be done away through minimization. Furthermore, it is easy to come to grateful
conclusions about the place you call home. The value of the “little things”
will probably increase after the trip. Lastly, I cannot omit the rejuvenating
properties of travel. We have all heard of the importance of rewarding yourself
for hard work, meeting goals etc., and travel is (potentially arguable) THE best
reward for such behavior. Mind at ease, any length of travel provides both a
physical and mental separation between you and the problems of reality. Placing
yourself in such pleasant situations has to be beneficial (I mean, mental
health days are a thing, right?)and when I’m a doctor I’ll be sure to do the
research that would allow me to prescribe patient with “x Mandatory days of travel”
as a legitimate treatment.
Maybe it’s just me. Maybe all it will take is your first
trip abroad. Either way, I know that I cannot get enough of the adventure
entailed in travelling. The sites, the people, the cuisine, all of it cumulates
in an experience that is as much about the journey as it is the destination. We
cannot afford to maintain such a narrow perspective as is developed by those
who never leave their home state. Not in a time of interconnectedness, of
globalization, were we must subscribe to a global rather than statial way of
thought. Opportunity is there: the money, the methods, and the destinations.
There is no excuse to not go out and experience the world, our world. Go out
and gain the perspective, BE a cosmopolitanis, a citizen of the world.
safe travels.
-Stephen
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Critical Thinking and American Academic Culture
It goes without saying that there are inherent flaws within the American academic system, particularly at the high school and undergraduate levels. These problems are born of the culture of “teaching (or learning) to the test” present within these systems. I’m not talking about the meritocracy of schools based on standardized test scores (which is, in itself, a massive problem which I will not here address for fear of pulling out all my hair), rather the lack of critical thinking among students and the short comings of methods used by teachers (not across the board; I’ve had several teachers who actually excelled at this, you know who you are) to encourage it.
Firstly, let me say that this problem is in part due to the culture of laziness that has become toxically present in American culture as a whole, which plays a large role in what I will go into here. I will use as examples two classes in which I am currently enrolled; a political science class and a philosophy class. It is important to note that I’m not saying critical thinking is more important in these fields than in others, quite the opposite, it is important in every aspect of life, these are just the examples I am using.
On the one hand, we have my political science class. This class features what would, in a perfect world, be a good method of encouraging critical thinking among students. We are assigned for each class period one or two pieces of academic literature to read, after which we are to think of a thought provoking question to be used during in class discussion. The catch? You don’t necessarily have to read the entire thing to be able to write at least a passable question. This is one example of learning to the test, of doing just enough to get the grade, of being too lazy to do the work thoroughly and properly. I’m by no means saying that I’m not guilty of this, because I am; I am, however, saying that this example represents one of the problems I see in American academia. While this method is intended to encourage critical thinking, it accomplishes the opposite; because it isn’t necessary to complete the reading in its entirety, thereby taking in all the information therein, it is not critical thinking that is achieved, rather a honing of BS skills, and I don’t mean bachelors of science.
On the other hand, we have my philosophy class. This class takes what I see as the opposite approach to critical thinking. The assignments in this course also consist of readings; however the written portion is not some thought provoking question, rather a summary of what you read. Assignments like this have been lamented since middle school for their simplicity, (supposed) lack of critical thinking, and lack of academic merit in general. I would contest, however, that they accomplish the task better than the method explained above. Because getting a good grade requires completion of the reading assignment from start to finish, the student is forced to take in all the information in the text, or at least look at it enough to write a brief summary. While not directly or intentionally targeting critical thinking, this method certainly exposes the student to more information and, thereby, provides a better understanding of the course material.
As I stated above, the real issue is American laziness. Methods like the ones above are necessary because American students, by and large, don’t want to think critically, they want to get good enough grades to walk across the stage in June. It will not be until this overarching cultural issue is resolved that students will learn for the sake of learning, think because they want to think, study to gain knowledge, as opposed to merely going through the motions to get the grade.
-Sam
Sunday, October 26, 2014
Rites of Passage, Part II
It’s been
almost a year since my original post about rites of passage (look, I used the
proper form of the word, this time). In the time bygone, I have had a few
experiences that I think allow me to now compose part two.
I’ll start
with this summer, when I was employed as a miner in a limestone quarry. Whilst
working in this mine, I was subjected to not hazing or purposefully instituted
rites of passage in so many words, but to the stereotypical blue-collar “Fucking
New Guy” (FNG) stuff. Let me preface what I’m about to say; I don’t come from
some posh white-collar upbringing, I was raised doing farm work, earning my
keep at home, and hunting because we needed meat, not because I had a new
$12,000 shotgun that daddy bought me – my point is that working in a
blue-collar environment was nothing new to me. Back to the quarry; as the FNG,
I unfailingly drew the most undesirable job: driving a haul truck. Don’t get me
wrong, there aren’t too many engrossingly interesting jobs in a limestone quarry,
but driving a haul truck in a half mile long semi-circle for ten hours straight
for six days a week is the pinnacle or boredom. So, as the new guy, I was
relegated to doing this for the duration of my employment (don’t mistake this
for ingratitude, because I’m very grateful to have had the job, money, and
experience). However, working in this quarry provided me with opportunities not
only to learn how this industry operates, at least one a base level, it got me
a lifelong certification as a miner in the state of Virginia, a basic knowledge
of how to operate a few different pieces of equipment, improved my driving
skills immensely, and provided me a chance to work with down to earth men. I
was never made fun of or joked about any more than the new guy on any job site
and I was never made to do anything dangerous or embarrassing (there isn’t any
room for these types of fuck fuck games in a mine), but I knew that the jovial
shit talking and joking radio transmissions were all part of being the new guy
and earning a place on the quarry crew.
On another
level, I began this summer my second year at VMI. A 180 from last year, I found
myself in a position of power and influence as a member of the cadre in charge
of preparing and training the newly arrived rats. Firstly, let me say that the
cadre with whom I worked displayed nothing but the utmost professionalism and
expertise in their methods. As I went through the process of Hell Week, this
time on the other side, I thought back to my own experience as a rat; methods I
thought helped me learn, things that I thought were impractical, etc. and used
this tool box I’d accrued over the past year to make my own training more
effective. Now, my Hell Week was no walk in the park, by any means, but there
was never a moment that was easy or even pleasant, and I made sure, as a member
of cadre, that this year’s rat mass had the same experience of constant
physical and mental strain while also achieving basic aptitude in the ways of a
cadet. They were never hazed, they were never needlessly embarrassed, they were
never made to do anything dangerous (these things are not the cadre’s job), but
the whole ordeal represents one of the most rigorous rites of passage in the US
higher education system.
Now that
I’ve been on the receiving and delivering ends of these rites of passage in
several settings, I think that yes, society is certainly getting softer
(something I think needs desperately to be remedied), but the fact that rites
of passage still exist in mundane places like a work site, that young men still
want to come to such a challenging place as this to test their mettle, and the
fact that people like me continue to insure that the FNG’s get the same tough
and testing experiences as we had says that rites of passage are not dead,
they’re just sick, and society needs to provide the medicine.
-Sam
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Reestablishment
of U.S. Power in the International System
Cadet
Stephen M. Bernard
Virginia
Military Institute
Abstract
This paper
explores the position of the United States in the international system. It
outlines the U.S. rise to power and explains why the United States has fallen
from the position of power it had originally held. Guided by Thomas L. Friedman
and Michael Mandelbaum’s book That Used to be US, I apply parts of their
5-point solution to the issues of globalization and the information technology
revolution. After outlining these issues, I use textual analysis to connect
these two issues to depict the adaptation necessary by the United States to
reestablish themselves in the global community.
Reestablishment of
U.S. Power in the International System
The history of the United States can be
characterized by the term exceptionalism. Defined in the Merriam-Webster
dictionary, exceptionalism is the condition of being different from the norm;
also, a theory expounding the exceptionalism of a nation or region. America and
its citizens have traditionally risen to face adversity. When the Soviets were
transporting nuclear missiles to Cuba, national unity provided support to an
administration who applied strength to mitigate the threat. At the tail end of
the Great Depression of the early 20th Century and in the midst of
the Second World War, car plants were turned into tank factories, stay at home
moms built American Naval vessel—all for the purpose of defeating the axis of
evil. Thomas L. Friedman and Michael Mandelbaum in That Used to be Us question
America’s ability to meet today’s challenges by providing four areas of modern
society pioneered by the United States but now dominated by other nations. The
four areas they describe are globalization, the information technology
revolution, chronic economic deficits, and energy consumption management. To offer a solution on how the US can
restore its former global presence, the authors prescribe a five-part solution
through education, infrastructure, immigration, research and development, and
regulation. (376) I will explain globalization and the information technology
revolution, the relationship between the two, and propose solutions offering a course
that the United States must take to adapt to today’s global community.
Globalization,
as presented by Friedman and Mandelbaum, catalyzed the other challenges faced
by the United States in the modern international system. Therefore,
globalization was and is crucial to the development and expansion of nations
(such as China, Germany, and Japan) that now aggressively compete with the
United States. Defined as the free movement of people, goods, services and
capital across national borders, globalization truly appeared following World
War II. The global system was designed and implemented by the United States to establish
more democratic, free-trade, governments following the destruction of the war. Well equipped to participate a system designed
by Americans, the United States prospered from the free trade of economic
expansion.
Economic
prominence through trade agreement led to America’s role as an international
power and set the example for modern state progression. Observing western
prosperity, globalization policies took footholds in nations such as China
which identified incredible profit potential in an increasingly competitive
market where adaptability and flexibility are essential to excel. (19) This
profit potential did not solely exist in
the competitive market but because of
its competition. China, among others, identified and proceeded to exploit the
value of lower prices to the consumer. This trend results in the current
dominance of China in the manufacturing industry, they are able to outcompete
American products by offering finished goods at a lower price to the consumer
through the use of lower labor wages. Solvable by tariffs to protect the
domestic market, foreign products can be made at a lower cost, increasing the
profit margin for small businesses. That pattern leads to the outsourcing of
labor jobs, a topic covered later in this essay.
Following
the events of the Cold War was an era of change in the international system.
Utilizing the metaphor of evolution observed in nature, methods of adaptation as
conducted in the consolidation of companies, nations, institutions, and even
individuals will be the determinant of who will survive, or in the reality of
globalization, thrive in the future of the international environment. (23) Furthermore,
the states which emerged from the Cold War era should have devised systems to
interact in the new international system. Therein lays the problem with the
globalization challenge as faced by the United States. Established as the
strongest nation in the world following WWII, the United State’s position in
global dominance has been in recession. Since the end of the Cold War, the
complacency of American leaders to systematically adapt to the fundamental
changes in the global environment has lead to the American power decline. (23) The
transition from the twentieth to the twenty-first century created new markets
and economic certainties at rates unparalleled in human history. Exponential
growth in globalization created complex webs of connectivity between distant
states and increased competition in job markets on the global scale.
To
further explore how the United States had fallen behind, Americans should call
upon the event where the CEO of Apple, an American based company, was
approached in an attempt to return the production of Apple products from
foreign sites back to the US. He responded with an answer suggesting that such a
return of jobs was improbable. Basing his decision from the comparison of labor
force flexibility, industrial capacity, and reliability of the workers in
foreign countries compared to labor in the United States, the CEO aptly came to
the conclusion that the difficulty of maintaining a high profit margin through
domestic manufacturing would deter customers. With the establishment of Unions
and institutions such as OSHA, American employment in an industrial factory seems
to imply the de facto indispensability of the low-skill worker. This system
cannot compete with the growing pool of low-wage, high-skilled worker found
abroad. (60) Global economic change has empowered the businesses of the private
sector versus the institutions of the government. This shift to small
businesses also created a highly competitive market, compelling participants to
use their freedoms as business owners to advance themselves ahead of the
competition. Attitudes that drive companies towards success also drive
companies such as Apple to seek maximized profit by job exportation as opposed
to job creation in the United States. (58)
Addressing
the challenge of globalization, a policy solution should be pursued by the
elected leaders of the United States. Representative Bob Inglis (R-SC) calls
for imperative collaboration between the American major opposing political
parties. (353) As a part of the solution, a regulation aspect of the five-part
prescription by Friedman and Mandelbaum describes the necessity of finding
middle ground between the two ideologies (of the major political parties) which
govern the state. The theoretical middle ground between state leaders will
facilitate federal regulation conducive toward the changes necessary for active
competition in the global market of today.
The
information technology revolution was initiated in the United States with the
production of transistors, satellites, and the personal computer. They
eventually evolved into consumer products such as the internet, cell phones,
and the IPad. Globalization disassembled monopolies in information technology
from the United States to create the international system of competition in the
IT industry. Products and industrial concepts were introduced into the world
community by American-based companies. (30) Competing countries, grasping the
IT revolution, began out-producing America and outperforming the United States
in its own domestic markets. This trend can be observed in the automobile
market where foreign companies such as Honda, Toyota, or Volkswagen compete in
terms of price, efficiency, and durability and outperform American companies
like General Motors or Ford.
Adaptation
to the transformation of the international system and economy by the United
States is crucial to acquiring a position of power and solving the IT
revolution issue. Education as well as research and development are applicable
from the five-part solution to current challenges. Drawing upon another example
outlined in That Used to be Us, IBM almost collapsed in the
technological revolution during the time of the personal computer. Inventing
the pc was considered a side project as the business remained stagnant in its
ways, utilizing business models designed for the business world that it had
once dominated; the company remained oblivious to the market as it would
become. It adapted and survived through self-criticism and analysis of the
world in which it operated. (375) Just as prevalent as product manufacturing in
considering a solution to the IT revolution is the competition in the job
market. Education is incredibly relevant as analytical and innovative skills
must be further developed in secondary schools to become a business asset in
the technological industry. (88) Where factory workers were once needed to
produce that which was in demand by the consumer, machines have proven more
efficient. White collar jobs at the entry level have also been progressively
eliminated as individuals possessing bachelors and graduate degrees produce
higher human capital and are more desirable than those without. (57)
The United States demonstrated exceptionalism in
nearly every problem it had faced. However,
the problem was nearly always tangible; whether it was the economic
downturn of the depression, daunting fascist regimes in WWII, or threatening
communist activity during the Cold War. In the modern system, the challenges
are inexplicably different and more complicated. The current intangible
challenges of globalization and the information technology revolution are
incredibly intertwined; the international community moved from fragmented and
fractionalized to free exchange and competition rich. Although recent US trends
ignore our history of global leadership, seemingly to be replaced by states
such as China, adaptation and focus upon prescriptive application of education, infrastructure, immigration, research
and development, and regulation – the five-part solution offered by Friedman
and Mandelbaum—can actualize true American potential. Col. Mark Mykleby,
formerly assigned to the United States Special Operation Command and currently
a senior fellow at the New America Foundation, calls on the American people to
mobilize towards the solution and discuss the obvious challenges to maintain
the citizen’s obligation to the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution. (377)
Challenged in fields such as globalization and the
information technology revolution, I have outlined solutions guided by Friedman
and Mandelbaum’s That Used to be Us, I offered a response to the gradual decline of American
power in the international system. As citizens of the United States, individuals
may encourage elected officials to influence policymaking. Traditional American
values encourage small business and domestic goods, by reaching across the
aisle and implementing common sense, policy will revitalize the American
economy without severing foreign ties. Increases on the importance of higher
education will produce a highly skilled labor force and incredibly valuable
human capital. Higher education will also shift the balance of the IT
revolution as American citizens regain their place at the forefront of
technological innovation. The United States’ history exemplifies that high
values and ideals fuel hard working and zealous individuals who are able to
attain the stereotypical American dream, by
their own merit. Hope lays in that precedence, so that today’s American
people may do the same and reestablish their country in a position of power in
the international system.
References
Friedman,
Thomas L., and Michael Mandelbaum. That
used to be us: how America fell behind in the
world it invented and how we can come back. New York: Farrar, Straus and
Giroux, 2011.
Sunday, June 29, 2014
Perspective from the Aloof: Gay Marriage
Are you ready for the controversy? Here goes: gay marriage. I’m hoping I won’t alienate all four and a half readers we have; mostly just the half, that kind of weirds me out.
Back to gay marriage. If you have read any of my previous pieces, you know I am not what one would call liberal or progressive in the political sense of the words. You also know that I’m not exactly a member of the religious majority, particularly here in the heart of the Bible belt and Falwell-land. So, I am – for the most part – politically right winged, a very religious non-Christian person with a strong background in the Bible and a childhood spent in the bosom of the Christian church; what could I possibly think about gay marriage? It’s simple, as far as I’m concerned: let ‘em do it.
Now, I do maintain a couple “conditions”. For one, don’t call it marriage, marriage is a religious institution created by religion, for religion, and, in this country whose cultural norms are largely based in Christian tradition, consisting of one man and one woman (what? A pagan defending traditional marriage?!) That being said, the government does not and should not ever have the right to tell you who you can love or with whom and the manner in which you can copulate (within the law, of course; I still don’t at all condone rape or pedophilia, but that’s a topic for another day). My solution for the government is this: let gay couples enjoy the tax breaks, benefits, insurance, etc. of a traditional married couple, call it a “civil union” or something of that manner, stop trying to legislate the harmless parts of morality, and stay the fuck our of our private lives. We all have the right to pursue happiness as stated in the Declaration of Independence, and as long as that pursuit doesn’t harm or infringe on the rights of others, then the government shouldn’t have a damn word to say about it.
Back to gay marriage. If you have read any of my previous pieces, you know I am not what one would call liberal or progressive in the political sense of the words. You also know that I’m not exactly a member of the religious majority, particularly here in the heart of the Bible belt and Falwell-land. So, I am – for the most part – politically right winged, a very religious non-Christian person with a strong background in the Bible and a childhood spent in the bosom of the Christian church; what could I possibly think about gay marriage? It’s simple, as far as I’m concerned: let ‘em do it.
Now, I do maintain a couple “conditions”. For one, don’t call it marriage, marriage is a religious institution created by religion, for religion, and, in this country whose cultural norms are largely based in Christian tradition, consisting of one man and one woman (what? A pagan defending traditional marriage?!) That being said, the government does not and should not ever have the right to tell you who you can love or with whom and the manner in which you can copulate (within the law, of course; I still don’t at all condone rape or pedophilia, but that’s a topic for another day). My solution for the government is this: let gay couples enjoy the tax breaks, benefits, insurance, etc. of a traditional married couple, call it a “civil union” or something of that manner, stop trying to legislate the harmless parts of morality, and stay the fuck our of our private lives. We all have the right to pursue happiness as stated in the Declaration of Independence, and as long as that pursuit doesn’t harm or infringe on the rights of others, then the government shouldn’t have a damn word to say about it.
-Sam
Saturday, June 28, 2014
Party Systems and Our Form of Democracy; the problem and a solution
Good morning, readers! As I am charging up for the day on my mandatory dosage of Fox News, I noticed myself wondering off the prescribed train of thought given by the morning anchors.
The headlines were not capturing my attention, rather the situations, actors, and leaders that took action to contribute to the event which warranted national audience(according to Fox producers). Specifically, how ignorant people must be to bring certain individuals to power within government (whose names I will not divulge at the risk of losing whatever sort of objectivity I had going into this post) and how we DEFINITELY need to institute a basic knowledge test to individuals attempting to register to vote.
But that's beside the point I hope to portray....
Is the system installed in the modern day United States truly the best form of democracy? Is the government an excellent representation of the people with both vertical and horizontal accountability, a strong sense of party identification?
The simple answer is no.
We have a Single Member District, First Past the Post (FPTP) system were a voter casts 1 vote to a candidate of their choosing who represents a party and runs on a platform projecting that parties' core values. Among other follies, this system offers an inherent sentiment of 'wasted votes'and little party identification resulting in lower voter turnout and uneducated voters.
To combat current electoral problems, I propose a consideration of the mixed proportional electoral system where voters casts 2 ballots;1 for a candidate and 1 for the party. Such a method eliminates the 2 party system, accurately represents it's constituents, increases party identification, every vote counts, and it maintains the same levels of vertical accountability (between the voter and the representative) as our FPTP system. Would congress be productive with the incredible diversity offered by mixed proportional?...possibly a topic for a different time.
Food for thought...
-Stephen
The headlines were not capturing my attention, rather the situations, actors, and leaders that took action to contribute to the event which warranted national audience(according to Fox producers). Specifically, how ignorant people must be to bring certain individuals to power within government (whose names I will not divulge at the risk of losing whatever sort of objectivity I had going into this post) and how we DEFINITELY need to institute a basic knowledge test to individuals attempting to register to vote.
But that's beside the point I hope to portray....
Is the system installed in the modern day United States truly the best form of democracy? Is the government an excellent representation of the people with both vertical and horizontal accountability, a strong sense of party identification?
The simple answer is no.
We have a Single Member District, First Past the Post (FPTP) system were a voter casts 1 vote to a candidate of their choosing who represents a party and runs on a platform projecting that parties' core values. Among other follies, this system offers an inherent sentiment of 'wasted votes'and little party identification resulting in lower voter turnout and uneducated voters.
To combat current electoral problems, I propose a consideration of the mixed proportional electoral system where voters casts 2 ballots;1 for a candidate and 1 for the party. Such a method eliminates the 2 party system, accurately represents it's constituents, increases party identification, every vote counts, and it maintains the same levels of vertical accountability (between the voter and the representative) as our FPTP system. Would congress be productive with the incredible diversity offered by mixed proportional?...possibly a topic for a different time.
Food for thought...
-Stephen
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
A Piece on Paganism
When you hear the word “paganism”, you probably think of
stuff like witches, tarot cards, upside down stars, and some seriously archaic
“B.C.” cultures. While none of that is necessarily out of the picture or
incorrect, I would like to take a little time and space here to discuss a type
of paganism – or neo-paganism, rather – called Ásatrú.
Ásatrú
[Ow-sa-tru] is the belief in the old gods of the Germanic and Scandinavian
Northmen of the first millennium (and beyond); you probably think of them as
Vikings. The word Ásatrú comes from the Old Norse language and means “one who
believes in the Æsir (the gods of Asgard).” In order to discuss Ásatrú as a
religion, I feel I must first provide a brief overview of some key tenants of
the religion. Firstly, Ásatrúar (those who practice the religion) believe that
the universe is separated into nine realms or worlds: Asgard (the realm
of the Æsir, gods of war, life, and greater things), Vannaheim (home of
the Vannatrú, the “lesser” gods of more mundane things like agriculture,
natural aspects, and fertility), Midgard (the realm of men, i.e. Earth),
Swartalfheim (the realm of the dark elves, or dwarves as we call them), Alfheim
(realm of the elves), Jottunheim (the realm of the giants), Hel
(the realm of the dead, not Hell as in Judeo-christian theology, rather a place
where normal people go when they die, ruled by the goddess Hel), Hel is located
on the icy shores of Niflheim (this is the icy of the two primordial
elements), and Musspelsheim (the fiery primordial realm). All of these
realms are inhabited by their own peoples, about whom there are hundreds of
thousands of myths and legends, some of which are important parts of Ásatrú and
some, merely amusing tales for bedtime. I wish I could go into depth about some
of these tales, but I haven’t the time nor anywhere near the space to do them
justice.
I suppose
the best way to give a brief explanation of Ásatrú is to recount my own
experiences with the religion. I was raised a Presbyterian Christian; my family
are all very strong in their faith in the Christian God and his Son, as was I.
It was around the age of seventeen that I discovered Ásatrú through the brother
of a teammate. I’d always found the old Norse legends about heroes like Sigurd
and the gods like Thor, Odin, and Tyr to be fascinating and fantastic, so I
eagerly accepted an invitation to go with my teammates brother to a Moot
(monthly gathering to do ritual) on the first Saturday of the month. It was
like nothing I’d ever experienced. We (myself and a surprising number of Ásatrú
who’d also come) gathered around an antler and bone covered stone altar flanked
by on either side by two roaring fires, all in a clearing in the woods under
the stars. Unsure what to expect, I paid very close attention to the goings on
as a loud and primitive tattoo of drums began to sounds. As the drums
continued, a priest walked out of the trees, his face and bare chest streaked
with ash as he shouted Old Norse prayers to the four directions and to certain
gods as he began the Moot. Following some more traditional speech on the gods
and a more contemporary sermon on self-reliance, a bowl of mead (honey wine),
was passed around and everyone took a drink. I was struck by the amazing energy
I felt during Moot; it was like a primeval force held everyone there together
in some regard, as if some connection stronger than any I’d felt had been
forged. Following Moot, we left the woods and went back to the field where the
longhouse was and gathered around a huge bonfire for what is called Symbal ([SUM-ball]
which is a ritual during which everyone makes a toast in a circle three times,
the first to a god, the second to an ancestor or hero, and the third is a boast
or a vow of some deed). During Symbal, everyone was more relaxed and it turned
riotously funny at some times and touchingly somber at others as people told
stories of past exploits or toasted their dead grandfather.
So what
draws someone to something as antiquated as Ásatrú, you may ask? I can only
speak to my experiences on the matter; it’s different for everybody in every religion.
Since that first Moot I’ve been to two more as well as other gatherings including
work parties and the like. I’ve always been met with nothing short of kindred
spirits and what I can only describe as the best of Southern hospitality. I
realize that these experiences could be had quite literally anywhere under any
circumstances, so I’ll try to explain a little about Ásatrú itself that drew me
to it.
Firstly, as
many of you know, I, as a VMI Cadet, hold honor and integrity in the highest
regard. This is perhaps the biggest reason that I felt drawn to Ásatrú, the
fact that, in its culture, there is nothing higher than honor, than being able
to do what you say and keep your vows. I love the idea that men are accountable
for what they say and do, regardless of circumstance, and that someone is
expected to maintain their honor no matter what. The second, but equally
influential aspect of Ásatrú with which I feel a strong connection is the idea
that a man mustn’t be passive in his doings. That is to say that if a man wishes
to accomplish something, he can’t accomplish it by sitting around and wishing
it to happen, he can’t (although I think it helps) just pray for something to
happen or for the gods to do it for
him, he has to go out and fucking do it for himself. The gods
smile on those who serve themselves, on those who are strong and have a strong
will. This concept aligns very closely with my own feelings on the subject; I
believe strongly that those who are passive in their lives and wait for things to happen are sheep and
doomed to be devoured by the wolves who are aggressive and go out and make things happen. Thirdly, and the
last to be discussed here, are the strong bonds of family and kinship that are
found in Ásatrú. Ásatrúar believe very strongly in one another and will do
anything to help or protect their family and friends. This is something I can
relate to very well as an American, a Cadet, and as a man in general. I mean,
even after you’ve lost all you have in this world, after everything changes,
your family is still there with you and nothing can change that. I would gladly
kill or die for any of my family and those friends of mine who have come to be
my brothers.
These are
just a few broad reasons why I’ve started down the path of Ásatrú. Short of
going into deep philosophical and spiritual talks (which may well follow,
pending the interest here shown), I can’t get too intricate and maintain a
level of comprehensible meaningfulness, as a cursory brush over anything of a
religious nature does it no justice. At any rate, I hope this has been at least
mildly interesting and informative. As I said, I may bang out some more
specific things, perhaps on certain gods themselves, specific aspects of
Ásatrú, etc.
This has
been a poorly organized and hasty exposé on Ásatrú by Sam Crawford.
Rah
Virginia Mil.
Monday, January 6, 2014
My Trip Into the Wilderness, Never Forget What Makes You Happy
Sorry for not posting in a while! I had to find some sort of escape from all of life's ridiculousness so I chose to call an old friend of mine to join my on a trek into Charles C. Deam's Wilderness area in Hoosier National Forest. We took the Grubb Ridge trail route to the Peninsula on Lake Monroe. An 8.1 mile hike in was filled with sights of a winter beauty and untouched nature- culminating into the exact mental remedy I needed to sooth a mixture of anxiety and the clutter of thought that seemed to plague me as my time away from "Mother I" wound down.
I packed a majority of the group gear and food to increase my ruck weight in hopes of adding a bit of training to the excursion - my pack was over 80lbs which, for any backpacking aficionados that may be reading this post, is an extremely heavy pack for a weekend trip. Even with that burden, my buddy and I managed to keep our pace between 3 and 4mph which allowed us plenty of time to set up camp before nightfall (we hit the trailhead around 1300) as well as ample time to leave before the great snow storm hit the midwest.
The weekend living by our own means among the frozen trees of wilderness, aloof from civilization, fostered my ability to reflect on the transformation I have personally experienced during my first semester at college as well as the web of conflict which spun in my mind. My reflections were noted in a journal that I started to carry with me in hopes of developing my thoughts to post here, but until that time I will share only a brief idea on what I found to be a minor issue that I would argue we all face; an overlooking of appreciation for the "what" and "who" in our respective lives.
By subjugating myself to an experience that by nature (pun not intended) required minimalism of comforts and communication, I found that it was so easy to count our blessings. Not to speak from any sort of pedestal nor write in stanzas of cliches fit to bestow moral upon a child - but it is almost painful to observe the ease with which a plurality of individuals take. Taking what one wants by impulse of the moment with no grace nor wisdom of future implication or use normally always leads to a waste in one form or the other. With waste, in context, denoting negative consequence; my most immediate example is regret. As we grow up and move on to "bigger" and "better" experiences and pathways in life -- whether it be college, a career, discovering new places and things, or devoting yourself to a loved one -- the foundation to our joy and successes may be easily overlooked and (regretfully) forgotten or lost. As I realize that the decisions I am making shape the role I will fill in the world and ultimately the legacy I leave, the thought which anchors me when I feel so filled with ambition and goals that I will take off is the thought of my family's undying love and support.
On my trip, my good friend and I were able to go out with only what we were able to carry on our backs and each other, without the amenities of modern civilization, and create a memory that I know I will cherish for a long time. I believe everyone should stand that kind of vigil, one held within themselves. Never forget the "what" and "who."
- Stephen
Saturday, December 14, 2013
Modern Rights Of Passage - Part 1
Let me be the first to say that I am a proponent of the
grandest sort of allowing each man to make his own way in this world. That
being said, I will also be the first to point out that nobody may begin their
own way in America without first following in the footsteps of those who have
gone before. I speak of course of the concept of “rights of passage” in this,
the land of the free and the home of the brave.
Too often
have I been disappointed by the incessant whining of the general populace
around me as to the hardships of being a collegian, an athlete, fraternity
brother, sorority sister, or human being in general. I find it, to be quite
frank, disgusting that everybody thinks they should have their fortunes handed
to them on a silver platter. As a student of the lowest order (Rat) at what is
arguably the most rigorous military school in the nation, I feel that I am
slightly more qualified to speak on the topic of earning one’s place than most.
I am of the
mind that American society today has projected a picture to the populace of
everything being given when asked and nothing taking the least bit of blood,
sweat, or tears. I feel that this is a result of the pacification of American
society as a whole and the growing idea that we needn’t work for what we want
or out place in society or, indeed, the world. If one were to ask me where I
stand on the concept of hazing, I would likely respond that I am a proponent of
it. I know, I know, you’re thinking ‘how can you say something like that?’ It’s
simple, really, it’s my thinking, that if someone can’t undergo the hardships
of becoming a member of a fraternity, a club, or a corps of cadets, then how
can they be expected to adequately stand up to the trials of executive life,
combat, or, actual society?
In conclusion,
I would classify myself as one among the old breed of social thinkers. I am one
who thinks that one must first earn their place and prove their worth before
counting themselves among the ranks of those who have. I acknowledge that there
are less than pleasant things that occur during these “rights of passage” and
that not everyone who undertakes them will seed it through to the other side;
but I promise you, that those who do undergo these hardships, this baptism by
fire, will prove to be more dependable, reliable, and competent individuals.
-Sam
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)