Reestablishment
of U.S. Power in the International System
Cadet
Stephen M. Bernard
Virginia
Military Institute
Abstract
This paper
explores the position of the United States in the international system. It
outlines the U.S. rise to power and explains why the United States has fallen
from the position of power it had originally held. Guided by Thomas L. Friedman
and Michael Mandelbaum’s book That Used to be US, I apply parts of their
5-point solution to the issues of globalization and the information technology
revolution. After outlining these issues, I use textual analysis to connect
these two issues to depict the adaptation necessary by the United States to
reestablish themselves in the global community.
Reestablishment of
U.S. Power in the International System
The history of the United States can be
characterized by the term exceptionalism. Defined in the Merriam-Webster
dictionary, exceptionalism is the condition of being different from the norm;
also, a theory expounding the exceptionalism of a nation or region. America and
its citizens have traditionally risen to face adversity. When the Soviets were
transporting nuclear missiles to Cuba, national unity provided support to an
administration who applied strength to mitigate the threat. At the tail end of
the Great Depression of the early 20th Century and in the midst of
the Second World War, car plants were turned into tank factories, stay at home
moms built American Naval vessel—all for the purpose of defeating the axis of
evil. Thomas L. Friedman and Michael Mandelbaum in That Used to be Us question
America’s ability to meet today’s challenges by providing four areas of modern
society pioneered by the United States but now dominated by other nations. The
four areas they describe are globalization, the information technology
revolution, chronic economic deficits, and energy consumption management. To offer a solution on how the US can
restore its former global presence, the authors prescribe a five-part solution
through education, infrastructure, immigration, research and development, and
regulation. (376) I will explain globalization and the information technology
revolution, the relationship between the two, and propose solutions offering a course
that the United States must take to adapt to today’s global community.
Globalization,
as presented by Friedman and Mandelbaum, catalyzed the other challenges faced
by the United States in the modern international system. Therefore,
globalization was and is crucial to the development and expansion of nations
(such as China, Germany, and Japan) that now aggressively compete with the
United States. Defined as the free movement of people, goods, services and
capital across national borders, globalization truly appeared following World
War II. The global system was designed and implemented by the United States to establish
more democratic, free-trade, governments following the destruction of the war. Well equipped to participate a system designed
by Americans, the United States prospered from the free trade of economic
expansion.
Economic
prominence through trade agreement led to America’s role as an international
power and set the example for modern state progression. Observing western
prosperity, globalization policies took footholds in nations such as China
which identified incredible profit potential in an increasingly competitive
market where adaptability and flexibility are essential to excel. (19) This
profit potential did not solely exist in
the competitive market but because of
its competition. China, among others, identified and proceeded to exploit the
value of lower prices to the consumer. This trend results in the current
dominance of China in the manufacturing industry, they are able to outcompete
American products by offering finished goods at a lower price to the consumer
through the use of lower labor wages. Solvable by tariffs to protect the
domestic market, foreign products can be made at a lower cost, increasing the
profit margin for small businesses. That pattern leads to the outsourcing of
labor jobs, a topic covered later in this essay.
Following
the events of the Cold War was an era of change in the international system.
Utilizing the metaphor of evolution observed in nature, methods of adaptation as
conducted in the consolidation of companies, nations, institutions, and even
individuals will be the determinant of who will survive, or in the reality of
globalization, thrive in the future of the international environment. (23) Furthermore,
the states which emerged from the Cold War era should have devised systems to
interact in the new international system. Therein lays the problem with the
globalization challenge as faced by the United States. Established as the
strongest nation in the world following WWII, the United State’s position in
global dominance has been in recession. Since the end of the Cold War, the
complacency of American leaders to systematically adapt to the fundamental
changes in the global environment has lead to the American power decline. (23) The
transition from the twentieth to the twenty-first century created new markets
and economic certainties at rates unparalleled in human history. Exponential
growth in globalization created complex webs of connectivity between distant
states and increased competition in job markets on the global scale.
To
further explore how the United States had fallen behind, Americans should call
upon the event where the CEO of Apple, an American based company, was
approached in an attempt to return the production of Apple products from
foreign sites back to the US. He responded with an answer suggesting that such a
return of jobs was improbable. Basing his decision from the comparison of labor
force flexibility, industrial capacity, and reliability of the workers in
foreign countries compared to labor in the United States, the CEO aptly came to
the conclusion that the difficulty of maintaining a high profit margin through
domestic manufacturing would deter customers. With the establishment of Unions
and institutions such as OSHA, American employment in an industrial factory seems
to imply the de facto indispensability of the low-skill worker. This system
cannot compete with the growing pool of low-wage, high-skilled worker found
abroad. (60) Global economic change has empowered the businesses of the private
sector versus the institutions of the government. This shift to small
businesses also created a highly competitive market, compelling participants to
use their freedoms as business owners to advance themselves ahead of the
competition. Attitudes that drive companies towards success also drive
companies such as Apple to seek maximized profit by job exportation as opposed
to job creation in the United States. (58)
Addressing
the challenge of globalization, a policy solution should be pursued by the
elected leaders of the United States. Representative Bob Inglis (R-SC) calls
for imperative collaboration between the American major opposing political
parties. (353) As a part of the solution, a regulation aspect of the five-part
prescription by Friedman and Mandelbaum describes the necessity of finding
middle ground between the two ideologies (of the major political parties) which
govern the state. The theoretical middle ground between state leaders will
facilitate federal regulation conducive toward the changes necessary for active
competition in the global market of today.
The
information technology revolution was initiated in the United States with the
production of transistors, satellites, and the personal computer. They
eventually evolved into consumer products such as the internet, cell phones,
and the IPad. Globalization disassembled monopolies in information technology
from the United States to create the international system of competition in the
IT industry. Products and industrial concepts were introduced into the world
community by American-based companies. (30) Competing countries, grasping the
IT revolution, began out-producing America and outperforming the United States
in its own domestic markets. This trend can be observed in the automobile
market where foreign companies such as Honda, Toyota, or Volkswagen compete in
terms of price, efficiency, and durability and outperform American companies
like General Motors or Ford.
Adaptation
to the transformation of the international system and economy by the United
States is crucial to acquiring a position of power and solving the IT
revolution issue. Education as well as research and development are applicable
from the five-part solution to current challenges. Drawing upon another example
outlined in That Used to be Us, IBM almost collapsed in the
technological revolution during the time of the personal computer. Inventing
the pc was considered a side project as the business remained stagnant in its
ways, utilizing business models designed for the business world that it had
once dominated; the company remained oblivious to the market as it would
become. It adapted and survived through self-criticism and analysis of the
world in which it operated. (375) Just as prevalent as product manufacturing in
considering a solution to the IT revolution is the competition in the job
market. Education is incredibly relevant as analytical and innovative skills
must be further developed in secondary schools to become a business asset in
the technological industry. (88) Where factory workers were once needed to
produce that which was in demand by the consumer, machines have proven more
efficient. White collar jobs at the entry level have also been progressively
eliminated as individuals possessing bachelors and graduate degrees produce
higher human capital and are more desirable than those without. (57)
The United States demonstrated exceptionalism in
nearly every problem it had faced. However,
the problem was nearly always tangible; whether it was the economic
downturn of the depression, daunting fascist regimes in WWII, or threatening
communist activity during the Cold War. In the modern system, the challenges
are inexplicably different and more complicated. The current intangible
challenges of globalization and the information technology revolution are
incredibly intertwined; the international community moved from fragmented and
fractionalized to free exchange and competition rich. Although recent US trends
ignore our history of global leadership, seemingly to be replaced by states
such as China, adaptation and focus upon prescriptive application of education, infrastructure, immigration, research
and development, and regulation – the five-part solution offered by Friedman
and Mandelbaum—can actualize true American potential. Col. Mark Mykleby,
formerly assigned to the United States Special Operation Command and currently
a senior fellow at the New America Foundation, calls on the American people to
mobilize towards the solution and discuss the obvious challenges to maintain
the citizen’s obligation to the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution. (377)
Challenged in fields such as globalization and the
information technology revolution, I have outlined solutions guided by Friedman
and Mandelbaum’s That Used to be Us, I offered a response to the gradual decline of American
power in the international system. As citizens of the United States, individuals
may encourage elected officials to influence policymaking. Traditional American
values encourage small business and domestic goods, by reaching across the
aisle and implementing common sense, policy will revitalize the American
economy without severing foreign ties. Increases on the importance of higher
education will produce a highly skilled labor force and incredibly valuable
human capital. Higher education will also shift the balance of the IT
revolution as American citizens regain their place at the forefront of
technological innovation. The United States’ history exemplifies that high
values and ideals fuel hard working and zealous individuals who are able to
attain the stereotypical American dream, by
their own merit. Hope lays in that precedence, so that today’s American
people may do the same and reestablish their country in a position of power in
the international system.
References
Friedman,
Thomas L., and Michael Mandelbaum. That
used to be us: how America fell behind in the
world it invented and how we can come back. New York: Farrar, Straus and
Giroux, 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment